In a previous post, we described why a software bill of materials (SBOM) needs to be dynamic in order to be valuable for organizations. One of the biggest sources of that value is the enhanced security that dynamic SBOMs can deliver for organizations An SBOM creates a foundational data layer on which further security tools, policies and practices can be built. The U.S.
The software bill of materials (SBOM) is being widely touted as a way to ensure the security and integrity of software products. This is an accurate assessment, but not all SBOMs are created equal. Specifically, those that are dynamic are far more useful and effective than those that are not. In fact, SBOMs that are not dynamic—able to easily and automatically account for the constant change swirling around the software landscape—are of minimal use.
It has been nearly a year since the President Biden’s Executive Order 14028 catapulted Software Bills of Materials (SBOMs) from niche topic to the forefront of efforts to improve security of cyber supply chains. Since then not only have federal agencies including NIST and CISA delivered significant amounts of guidance and insight, but SBOMs have been the subject of intense debate across developer communities and beyond.
Emerging government regulations have driven the advancement of standards for securing software supply chains. The production of a Software Bill of Materials (SBOM) in a standard format is an increasing audit and compliance need for large organizations.
Guest Blog by Daniel Parmenvik – CEO of bytesafe.dev For many, Software Bill of Materials (SBOMs) have changed from a manual list of assets for due diligence procedures to become an integral and automated part of software development. The ever increasing appetite for open-source software translates into a need to keep track of software assets (or open-source dependencies) for all applications, at any given point in time.
Thanks to President Biden’s Executive Order on Cybersecurity (14028) last May, Software Bills of Material (SBOMs) are now discussed by developers, security and deployment teams and even boards of businesses around the world. These “ingredients” lists for software are mandated for those selling to US Federal government and are quickly becoming an expected element of any software implementation. Rightly so.