Security | Threat Detection | Cyberattacks | DevSecOps | Compliance

Enterprise account takeover solutions often look strong during procurement. The real test begins after go-live. Integration completes. Alerts begin flowing. Fraud, SOC, and digital leaders see new data. Now the question shifts from deployment to operationalization. How do enterprises turn early ATO visibility into measurable fraud reduction, faster investigations, and stronger regulatory posture?

DLP and Secude solutions work alongside each other to protect your IP data from generation to storage and in transit. Here’s how. Submarine motors. Aircraft engines. Spatial systems. Command platforms. No matter the product, CAD software underpins the modern Defense production chain and contains Defense contractors’ most confidential intellectual property (IP).

During Security Week 2025, we launched the industry’s first cloud-native post-quantum Secure Web Gateway (SWG) and Zero Trust solution, a major step towards securing enterprise network traffic sent from end user devices to public and private networks. But this is only part of the equation. To truly secure the future of enterprise networking, you need a complete Secure Access Service Edge (SASE).

Audiences around the world may be captivated by dramatic stories of con men like the Tinder Swindler. But this type of fraud is the exception rather than the rule. Most criminals go to great lengths to stay hidden and minimize the risk of getting caught. Sometimes, though, a criminal needs to show their face — or at least, a face — to pass identity checks.

Supplemental document checks are often required for businesses that conduct Know Your Customer (KYC) or Know Your Business (KYB) checks. Even when compliance isn’t required, organizations often collect supplemental documents for their own business purposes, such as risk assessments. In business contexts, a supplemental document is a non-government-issued document that you collect to support a risk assessment.

The skimmer doesn’t go inside the iframe. It doesn’t need to. In every significant payment page compromise of the last decade, the malicious code sat on the merchant’s page, outside the payment component entirely, watching form submissions, intercepting keystrokes, reading values before they ever reached the provider’s sandbox. This is the architecture SAQ A-EP merchants live in.

U.S. state privacy compliance now operates in an environment that doesn’t stand still. The number of state laws keeps growing, and their requirements continue to evolve through new effective dates, amendments, and guidance. By January 2026 alone, Indiana, Kentucky, and Rhode Island added three more state privacy laws. This makes one thing clear. Compliance is no longer something you implement once and revisit periodically. It has to stay accurate as the requirements keep shifting.

The biggest ransomware attacks of 2025 have shown that this threat remains critical for organizations across all sectors. Incidents such as the Change Healthcare attack, which compromised the data of nearly 190 million individuals, and the attack on Jaguar Land Rover, which forced production lines to halt and caused losses amounting to hundreds of millions of dollars, show that a single incident can impact both operational continuity and information confidentiality.

Security vendors love the man-in-the-middle attack. It’s the boogeyman of every TLS marketing page. Some shadowy figure intercepting your traffic, reading your secrets, stealing your data. A man-in-the-middle attack is when an attacker positions themselves between two parties on a network to intercept the traffic flowing between them. In the context of TLS, that means an attacker who can present a valid certificate can read everything in plaintext and proxy it on to the real server.