Security | Threat Detection | Cyberattacks | DevSecOps | Compliance

CVE-2026-69197 is an authorization flaw in the Content Delivery API of Umbraco CMS, an open source ASP.NET content management system. The Delivery API enforces member and Public Access checks on the node a caller directly requests, but it does not apply those same checks to nodes referenced through Content Picker or Multi-Node Tree Picker properties. The gap extends to pickers nested inside Block List, Block Grid, and Rich Text Editor blocks.

CVE-2026-70756 is a vulnerability in the Core component of Oracle WebLogic Server, part of Oracle Fusion Middleware. An unauthenticated attacker with network access over the T3 or IIOP protocols can compromise the server and take full control of it. The vulnerability carries a CVSS v3.1 base score of 9.8 (Critical). Oracle rates it as easily exploitable, with no privileges and no user interaction required. Confidentiality, integrity, and availability impacts are all rated high.

CVE-2026-76461 is a SQL injection vulnerability in the email parsing logic of Cisco AsyncOS Software for Cisco Secure Email Gateway, caused by insufficient validation of message content before it reaches a database query. An attacker who sends a crafted email message containing SQL statements can have those statements executed by the appliance as it processes the message. The vulnerability carries a CVSS v3.1 base score of 9.8 (Critical).

Today we are happy to announce the beta release of the CyCognito MCP server, which makes your external attack surface data consumable by any AI client that speaks the Model Context Protocol, including Claude, Cursor, and ChatGPT. The server runs on CyQL, the proprietary query language behind advanced search in our platform. CyQL is designed to ask precise questions about an attack surface, using operators suited to each type of asset, issue, and relationship.

CVE-2026-78006 is a deserialization of untrusted data vulnerability (CWE-502) in The Events Calendar, a WordPress plugin published by StellarWP, that allows an attacker to achieve remote code execution on the underlying host. The flaw sits in the is_safe_widget_instance function, whose guard against unsafe object data can be bypassed.

CVE-2026-44756, tracked by SAP under the name OVERPASS, is a memory corruption vulnerability in the SAP kernel code that processes the Extended Passport (EPP), a standard SAP tracing structure used to follow call sequences across distributed system landscapes. The flaw stems from missing boundary validation during deserialization of EPP data, which causes unsafe memory behavior when the kernel processes externally supplied length fields. The vulnerability carries a CVSS v3.1 base score of 10.0 (Critical).

CVE-2026-67281 is an unauthenticated file read vulnerability in WebFig, the web-based management interface in MikroTik RouterOS. A newly allocated session on the /jsproxy path retains a stale, uninitialized principal pointer that WebFig then uses for file authorization decisions. The vulnerability carries a CVSS v4.0 base score of 8.7 (High). A CVSS v3.1 base score has not been assigned in the CVE record at the time of writing.

CVE-2026-81891 is an unrestricted file upload vulnerability in Studio 42 elFinder, an open source web file manager embedded in a wide range of PHP applications and content management systems. The flaw sits in the checkExtractItems() function in php/elFinderVolumeDriver.class.php, which calls mimetypeInternalDetect() without passing the result through mimeTypeNormalize().

Attack surface management (ASM) is the discipline of continuously discovering, inventorying, assessing, and prioritizing every asset, control, and exposure across your environment. It gives you an always-on picture of what you actually have, rather than a point-in-time scan. Done right, it answers the three questions every security leader is really asking: What do I have? Where am I exposed? What do I fix first?

If you run a security team, a large part of the job is responding to change. Something in the environment moves, and you have to work out whether risk moved with it, and how quickly you need to act. Those changes arrive from two different directions, external and internal. Of course, we’re all familiar with the external ones. A new CVE drops, a proof of concept goes public, a ransomware group starts naming your sector. The internal ones start inside your own organization.