Security | Threat Detection | Cyberattacks | DevSecOps | Compliance

Ask AI to Choose a prompt Write a TLDR of this post Explain the security risk Summarize what CISOs should know Healthcare, as an industry vertical, is moving faster on agentic AI than it has in past technology evolutions. Some reports say it is outpacing other regulated industries. Ambient scribes are documenting patient visits in real time. Prior-authorization and revenue-cycle agents are handling payer workflows that used to require staff to log into multiple systems manually.

Recovery time objective (RTO) is how long a system can be down before the impact becomes unacceptable. Recovery point objective (RPO) is how much data the business can afford to lose, measured as a window of time before the incident. RTO looks forward from the moment things break. RPO looks backward from it. That distinction takes a paragraph to explain and years to get right, because the difficult part was never the definition.

A massive phishing campaign is using invisible Unicode tag characters to evade security filters, according to researchers at Microsoft. This technique, known as “ASCII smuggling,” has grown popular over the past year for launching AI prompt injection attacks, but the same tactic can hide suspicious text in emails.

The OWASP GenAI Security Project unveiled an Agent Control Standard in early September, donated to the project and aimed at runtime enforcement for agentic systems. It sets out that agents should be inspectable, traceable and instrumentable, with declarative hooks and policy enforcement across frameworks. ‍ It answers which controls belong around an agent.

That human review becomes a bottleneck as agents scale is now widely observed. Five or ten agents working in parallel produce more decisions than one reviewer can evaluate, and under queue pressure the review degrades into approval without examination. ‍ The usual response is to move up a level, reviewing intents and boundaries rather than individual outputs.

I have watched the security industry run a very profitable game with abbreviations for the last decade. The simple way to do it is to invent a category, give it a cool catchy abbreviation, market it as the missing piece of the stack, and repeat. The greatest examples are CTEM, BAS, ASM, and EASM. Every one of them arrived promising to close the gap the last one left open, and every one of them ended up as a line item on a renewal spreadsheet that nobody at the buyer‘s side could confidently defend.

The security industry killed CVE coverage as a credible metric, and it deserved to die. Vendors inflated the numbers for years in the name of depth, and nobody in the room had an incentive to ask whether they reflected real validated risk or just a longer signature list. So “CVE coverage is a vanity metric” became earned consensus. The question I keep coming back to is whether the autonomous pentesting era makes that consensus outdated.

On August 27, Google sent us an email. We did not. We barely recognized the hostname. None of us had thought about dev-docs.trackjs.com in about ten years.

Accelerating security solutions for small businesses‍ Tagore offers strategic services to small businesses. A partnership that can scale‍ Tagore prioritized finding a managed compliance partner with an established product, dedicated support team, and rapid release rate. Standing out from competitors‍ Tagore's partnership with Vanta enhances its strategic focus and deepens client value, creating differentiation in a competitive market.