Security | Threat Detection | Cyberattacks | DevSecOps | Compliance

NIST AI RMF vs ISO 42001: Choosing Your AI Governance Framework

NIST AI RMF and ISO/IEC 42001 answer different questions, so the choice is rarely about which one is better. One gives you a risk process your engineering teams can run. The other gives you a management system an auditor can certify. Organizations that treat them as rival options usually pick the wrong one for the problem in front of them. ‍

The Invisible Expansion of the Attack Surface: Shadow AI, MCP, and Third-Party Risk

AI adoption is moving faster than most of us anticipated and, more importantly, faster than most organizations can govern it. Organizations are implementing the use of AI-enabled applications, browser extensions, coding assistants, and automated agents to enable employees to work faster. In many cases, these tools are adopted without security review, procurement approval, or a clear understanding of where organizational data is being sent.

TITAN AI Demo Series: Automatically Build Custom Monitoring Rules

Manually configuring monitoring rules for every vendor category can be time consuming. TITAN Watch's Rule Builder Agent lets your team define monitoring logic in plain language, then automatically builds and applies the rules across your vendor ecosystem. No manual configuration, no rigid rule templates. In Episode 10 of SecurityScorecard's Demo Tuesday series, see the Rule Builder Agent in action.

Manage internal and external risk all from Vanta

Between audits, most GRC teams are managing risk with one eye closed. Vanta gives you the whole view: internal and third-party risk in one connected system, monitored continuously, not once a year. Vanta's Third-Party Risk Management discovers new vendors, cuts assessment time by 50%, and watches your vendor landscape for breaches and emerging threats. Vanta's Risk Management runs your full enterprise program: risk register, likelihood and impact scoring, residual risk, treatment plans, and board-ready reporting.

Supply chain risk management: What it is and why enterprises need it

Accelerating security solutions for small businesses‍ Tagore offers strategic services to small businesses. A partnership that can scale‍ Tagore prioritized finding a managed compliance partner with an established product, dedicated support team, and rapid release rate. Standing out from competitors‍ Tagore's partnership with Vanta enhances its strategic focus and deepens client value, creating differentiation in a competitive market.

EU AI Act Compliance Roadmap: What Enterprises Must Document and When

The EU AI Act reached a turning point this summer, and the headlines got it half right. Obligations for high-risk AI systems were postponed to December 2027 under the Digital Omnibus, adopted in June 2026. The transparency rules under Article 50 were not postponed, and they apply from August 2, 2026. ‍ Enterprises reading spring 2026 guidance are working from a timeline that no longer exists, and enterprises reading the headline about a delay may believe nothing is due.

Continuous Control Monitoring: What Annual Testing Misses

An annual control assessment produces evidence that a control operated on one day out of three hundred and sixty-five. Sampling narrows it further, since testing twenty-five items from a population of a thousand evidences the control for those twenty-five on that day. The certificate describes a moment and gets read as a year. ‍ Continuous control monitoring closes that interval by testing automatically and often.

How Regulated Data Leaks Through AI, One Paste at a Time

A support coordinator has a difficult letter to write. The customer record is open in one tab, a consumer AI assistant in another, and the deadline is this afternoon. She selects the record, copies it, pastes it into the prompt box, and asks for a polite draft. Thirty seconds later she has a good letter and a regulatory problem, and nobody in the organization knows about either. ‍ The sequence below traces that single action through to its consequences.

Cyber Risk Appetite Statements That Can Be Breached

Most cyber risk appetite statements cannot be breached. A board approves language about maintaining a low tolerance for disruption, the statement enters the policy library, and no observable event in the following three years violates it. A statement no event can cross is a value rather than a control. ‍ Making one testable requires four terms that get used interchangeably and mean different things, thresholds expressed in units something can exceed, and a defined response for when it does.