Security | Threat Detection | Cyberattacks | DevSecOps | Compliance

The rise of generative AI has fundamentally changed how we work, create, and collaborate. But as organizations rush to integrate AI tools into their workflows, they're inadvertently creating entirely new categories of data risk that traditional security measures weren't designed to handle.

Cybersecurity weaknesses span both software and hardware systems, creating numerous opportunities for exploitation. Among the most common access vectors leveraged by threat actors are phishing attacks and Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures (CVEs). When left unpatched, CVEs can pose significant risks to an organization’s systems, exposing sensitive data and operational assets to potential compromise.

The speakers at ShowMeCon 2025 explored why policy isn't protection without validation. AI, identity, and threat detection must align to reduce operational risk.

Lead Researchers: James Dyer and Louis Tiley Between May 5 and May 7, 2025, KnowBe4 Threat Lab identified a phishing campaign originating from accounts created on the legitimate service ‘EUSurvey’. Although this was a focused campaign, on a smaller-scale to others identified by the team, it employed a combination of sophisticated techniques worth highlighting.

AI-generated voice deepfakes present an urgent threat to organizations, according to researchers at Pindrop. The researchers warn that speech generation tools can create realistic-sounding cloned voices in near real-time, allowing attackers to hold live conversations with victims while imitating someone the victim knows. Additionally, these tools can now convincingly imitate human emotions, making social engineering attacks even more persuasive.

As a cybersecurity expert, you are aware that performing static scans is only one part of a good defense-in-depth strategy. Similarly, periodic vulnerability assessments, while valuable, are only a single piece of cyber defense fortification. Continuous Threat Exposure Management (CTEM) establishes a logical setting to control organizational threats proactively. CTEM enables an augmented cybersecurity posture, active real-time risk mitigation, and threat precursor disabling.

An insider attack is like an illness: prevention is better than a cure. Like illnesses, insiders can conceal their malicious actions, causing a lot of harm before they are detected. Planning a risk mitigation process helps you reduce the potential damage of insider threats by putting a stop to them early on. In this article, we discuss why mitigating insider threats is essential, how to go about it, and how Syteca can help you.

A recent revelation of a Chinese-manufactured “kill switch” embedded in power inverters has reignited global conversations about cyber risk, supply chain vulnerabilities and geopolitical dependencies in the Operational Technology (OT) ecosystem.

Pixel tracking violations have cost U.S. healthcare providers over $100 million in fines, exposing critical gaps in HIPAA compliance and patient data privacy. Failures included missing risk assessments, no consent, and weak vendor oversight.

Protecting client-side web applications and websites is a critical goal shared by both the application development and cybersecurity teams. Web application vulnerabilities are among the most common attack vectors. However, there’s still confusion over who owns client-side security: As application security shifts left, the answer is: both teams must collaborate.