Security | Threat Detection | Cyberattacks | DevSecOps | Compliance

Continuous Control Monitoring: What Annual Testing Misses

An annual control assessment produces evidence that a control operated on one day out of three hundred and sixty-five. Sampling narrows it further, since testing twenty-five items from a population of a thousand evidences the control for those twenty-five on that day. The certificate describes a moment and gets read as a year. ‍ Continuous control monitoring closes that interval by testing automatically and often.

EU AI Act Compliance Roadmap: What Enterprises Must Document and When

The EU AI Act reached a turning point this summer, and the headlines got it half right. Obligations for high-risk AI systems were postponed to December 2027 under the Digital Omnibus, adopted in June 2026. The transparency rules under Article 50 were not postponed, and they apply from August 2, 2026. ‍ Enterprises reading spring 2026 guidance are working from a timeline that no longer exists, and enterprises reading the headline about a delay may believe nothing is due.

Cybersecurity Threat Detection: A SOC Guide for 2026

You're probably living this already. Your SIEM is collecting more logs than anyone can read, your endpoint tool is firing alerts that look urgent until they aren't, and someone on the leadership team keeps asking whether the organization is “covered” without defining what covered means. That's the pressure behind cybersecurity threat detection in 2026. Teams don't need another disconnected console.

Emerging Threat: (CVE-2026-58048) cPanel & WHM Database Privilege Escalation via Database Rename

CVE-2026-58048 is a privilege escalation vulnerability in the database management functionality of cPanel & WHM, the hosting control panel developed by WebPros. An authenticated cPanel account holder with access to the MySQL/MariaDB database feature can execute arbitrary database commands with full administrative privileges, rather than being confined to the databases and grants tied to their own account. The CVE record carries a CVSS v4.0 base score of 9.4 (Critical).

The API Security Gap Behind Recent Supply Chain Breaches

Most coverage of software supply chain attacks focuses on the entry point: the poisoned package, the compromised maintainer account, the malicious commit. That’s the part that makes headlines, but it’s rarely the part that causes the damage. A malicious package sitting on a developer’s machine doesn’t exfiltrate anything by itself.

What Is gh0st RAT? How It Works, Spreads, and Steals Data

Ghost RAT (Remote Access Trojan) is a type of sophisticated malicious software that operates covertly, enabling unauthorized remote access and control of a victim’s computer system. Often deployed with malicious intent by cybercriminals, Ghost RATs are designed to evade detection and provide the attacker with a range of powerful capabilities, such as data theft, system manipulation, and surveillance.

Why Modern Email Security Requires More Than Sender Reputation

For years, email filtering worked from a stable premise: malicious messages would expose themselves through something observable. A suspicious domain, a spoofed sender, a known-bad attachment or a URL with poor reputation gave defenders a concrete signal to block. Those controls still stop commodity phishing. What has changed is that many convincing attacks now inherit trust rather than imitate it.

Many New Technologies, Products, and Tools for Modern Protection Programs in New York, New Jersey, and Florida

A lot of buyers still start with the most visible layer of protection: cameras, guards, or a front desk presence. The real gap usually sits behind that first impression. If doors, credentials, visitor flow, and response routines are loose, the rest of the program ends up documenting problems instead of preventing them.

The AI notetaker you can't see in the participant list

For about three years, the governance question around AI meeting assistants had a convenient property: you could see them. The tool joined the call as a named participant. It appeared in the attendee list. Everyone in the meeting had at least the theoretical opportunity to object, and a security team reviewing an incident could reconstruct which meetings had been recorded by looking at who else was in them.

Cyber Risk Appetite Statements That Can Be Breached

Most cyber risk appetite statements cannot be breached. A board approves language about maintaining a low tolerance for disruption, the statement enters the policy library, and no observable event in the following three years violates it. A statement no event can cross is a value rather than a control. ‍ Making one testable requires four terms that get used interchangeably and mean different things, thresholds expressed in units something can exceed, and a defined response for when it does.