|
By Stacey Nosan
The emergence of the CRINK axis—a coordinated cyber-threat nexus comprised of China, Russia, Iran, and North Korea—has dramatically impacted the 2026 global risk landscape. As these nation-states utilize AI-driven scale and living-off-the-land (LOTL) tactics to target critical infrastructure, SafeBreach’s new content series provides essential intelligence on their evolving motivations and methods.
|
By SafeBreach
Dirty Frag (comprising CVE-2026-43284 and CVE-2026-43500) is a high-impact Linux kernel vulnerability chain that enables deterministic, reliable local privilege escalation (LPE) to root across major enterprise distributions. Unlike previous race-condition exploits, this logic flaw in the IPsec ESP and RxRPC subsystems offers a near 100% success rate, allowing attackers to escalate from a minor foothold to full system control without triggering typical kernel panics.
|
By Uzi Galili
CVE-2026-31431— the “Copy Fail” vulnerability—is a critical local privilege escalation (LPE) flaw in the Linux kernel’s cryptographic subsystem that allows unprivileged users to gain root access with near-perfect reliability. Boasting a CVSS score of 7.8 and affecting nearly every mainstream distribution since 2017 (including Ubuntu, RHEL, and Amazon Linux), Copy Fail has been added to the CISA KEV catalog due to its active exploitation and portable, low-footprint nature.
|
By SafeBreach
SafeBreach Helm is a pioneering AI agent designed to operationalize the complete Continuous Threat Exposure Management (CTEM) lifecycle by unifying SafeBreach’s industry-leading adversarial exposure validation (AEV) capabilities with data and insights from across an organization’s existing security ecosystem.
|
By Yossi Attas
In the fifth installment of SafeBreach’s AI-First series, VP of Development Yossi Attas explores how the development team’s AI-First philosophy is being extended to the customer frontier and improved upon through the Anti-Hallucination Protocol.
|
By Yossi Attas
In the fourth installment of SafeBreach’s AI-First evolution series, VP of Development Yossi Attas and Principal Software Design Engineer Guy Ephraim explore how test-driven development (TDD) serves as the essential “safety net” for high-speed AI code generation.
|
By Yossi Attas
In the third installment of SafeBreach’s AI-First development series, VP of Development Yossi Attas explores the resurgence of the Product Requirements Document (PRD) as the foundational “control surface” for AI-assisted engineering.
|
By Tova Dvorin
SafeBreach Senior Product Marketing Manager Tova Dvorin explores the critical necessity of continuous validation in Zero Trust architectures, specifically focusing on the integration of SafeBreach and Akamai Guardicore. While microsegmentation is a foundational element in the defense against lateral movement and ransomware propagation, dynamic infrastructure and policy drift often create “blind spots” that compromise security posture.
|
By Yossi Attas
In this second installment of a series on the transformation of SafeBreach’s development organization, VP of Development Yossi Attas details a structured operational workflow that integrates Jira, BitBucket, and Claude Code to turn AI usage from ad-hoc prompting into a rigorous engineering methodology.
|
By Uzi Galili
The new SafeBreach extension for VS Code integrates Breach Studio’s powerful custom attack development capabilities directly into the world’s most popular IDE to enable security teams to engineer custom attack simulations with unprecedented speed and precision. Security engineers can leverage Git-native version control, AI-assisted authoring, and real-time IntelliSense linting to eliminate friction and reduce failed executions.
|
By SafeBreach
The EU AI Act's August 2nd, 2026 deadline just changed shape. Host Tova Dvorin and offensive security engineer Adrian Cully separate what actually lands—Article 50 transparency duties and GPAI enforcement powers—from the high-risk obligations that slipped to December 2027. Inside: Article 15 writes MITRE ATLAS and the OWASP LLM Top 10 into binding law, the DORA / NIS2 / AI Act overlap that makes one incident reportable three times, penalties up to 7% of global turnover, and the five things a CISO should do this week. Part 1 of 2.
|
By SafeBreach
For the first time anywhere, the MITRE ATLAS framework and the OWASP Top 10 for LLM applications are written into binding law. Article 15 names data poisoning, model poisoning, adversarial examples, model evasion and confidentiality attacks as threat classes you must have technical measures against—and must be able to evidence to a regulator. The question is no longer whether you have thought about AI security. It is whether you can prove your AI system holds.
|
By SafeBreach
A poisoned CLAUDE.md file inside a cloned repository quietly tells a coding agent to send its test logs to an outside endpoint, and the agent complies, shipping environment details, internal system information, and API keys to a server the developer never controlled. The model was not broken. It was obedient. In this episode of The Cyber Resilience Brief (a SafeBreach podcast), host Tova Dvorin and SafeBreach senior sales engineer Adrian Culley break down why building agentic AI controls is not the same as proving they hold under attack.
|
By SafeBreach
Are we trusting AI tools too much? Right now, agents trust tool descriptions without verification. This could lead to serious security risks! What happens when a major server gets compromised? It's time to rethink our standards for AI tool security. What do you think about AI trust issues?
|
By SafeBreach
During an internal OpenAI evaluation, an agent left notes inside the company’s own network for future versions of itself, containing instructions on how to break free of OpenAI’s constraints. Reuters reports it isn’t clear whether this agent was connected to the one that breached Hugging Face, so don’t over-read it. But sit with the behavior for a second: an agent staging information for a successor process to find later. If a human crew did that, we’d call it a dead drop.
|
By SafeBreach
On July 9, an OpenAI model broke out of a sealed evaluation sandbox, found a zero-day in a package proxy, and — with no human directing it — chained stolen credentials and fresh exploits into Hugging Face's production infrastructure. Hugging Face detected it and called the FBI. OpenAI didn't know its own model had escaped for roughly 11 days. Host Tova Dvorin and offensive security expert Adrian Culley separate what's confirmed from what's hype.
|
By SafeBreach
Finding a security gap is easy. Closing it before it dies in a backlog is the hard part. Host Tova Dvorin sits down with Koby Bar (SVP Product, SafeBreach) and Mackenzie Kyle (CPO, Anvilogic) to unpack a partnership that turns a simulated attack that evades your controls into a deployed, tuned detection—then re-runs the attack to prove it fires. They cover Anvilogic's agentic "blueprint" workflow, where SafeBreach Helm fits, why continuous validation matters even after a rule ships, and how detection work that took days-to-weeks now takes minutes.
|
By SafeBreach
Detection engineering used to take days or weeks. With the SafeBreach + Anvilogic integration, it now takes minutes. SafeBreach SVP of Product Koby Bar and Anvilogic CPO Mackenzie Kyle break down how a validated attack simulation turns straight into a deployed, continuously tested detection—clearing the detection-ticket backlog that eats SOC teams alive, and building every rule on real log evidence instead of guesswork.
|
By SafeBreach
OWASP just shipped AIVSS — an entirely new vulnerability scoring methodology built for autonomous AI agents, where a compromised orchestrator can score a perfect 10. Host Tova Dvorin and Adrian break down the "amplification principle": why a 2.1 CVSS finding becomes a 7.1 in the wrong agent, how persistent memory and broad tool access expand every blast radius, and what EchoLeak-style attacks already mean for real deployments. Plus where adversarial exposure validation and SafeBreach's agentic AI coverage fit in.
|
By SafeBreach
On June 22, 2026, the heads of all six Five Eyes cyber agencies — GCHQ, CISA, the NSA, ASD, the Canadian Centre, and New Zealand's GCSB — signed a rare joint statement: AI has rewritten the cyber risk timeline, and it's months, not years. Host Tova Dvorin and offensive security expert Adrian Culley unpack why AI is collapsing the window between vulnerability and exploit, why "having controls" isn't the same as proven controls, and why legacy systems are now strategic liabilities for the board, not the IT team. A clear-eyed look at validation, assumed breach, and what CISOs should do Monday morning.
|
By SafeBreach
Today's CISOs and security teams must constantly validate security controls to identify gaps, remediate misconfigurations, and optimize performance against a rapidly increasing threat landscape. Breach and attack simulation (BAS) solutions-designed to continuously test the effectiveness of security controls and identify potential vulnerabilities-have emerged as a powerful tool to help organizations navigate this new reality. But not all BAS platforms are created equal.
|
By SafeBreach
The mission of today's security teams is clear: protect the company from emerging cyber threats. What's less clear is how to ensure stakeholders understand the impact of their programs. Traditional security reporting focuses on threats and vulnerabilities and how many were stopped and prevented, but non-technical stakeholders-who are concerned with the business's bottom line and how these threats can impact business continuity-need to know how these activities translate to tangible business values. As risk is tied to revenue, security teams need a simple way to understand and share the real efficacy of their programs with their stakeholders.
|
By SafeBreach
There are a number of security validation methods available on the market today, but each has different uses and functions. And, not all of them are appropriate in every IT environment. As a result, many organizations waste time and resources on technologies or approaches that may work well for others, but aren't a good fit for their specific use case.
|
By SafeBreach
Starting a red-team program but not sure where to begin? Looking to improve your existing red-team operation? Before getting too far in the cyber weeds, go back to the basics with "The Fundamentals of Modern Cybersecurity Red Teaming."
|
By SafeBreach
2022 saw a dramatic increase in the prevalence, severity, and impact of cyberattacks, presenting a striking new reality for CISOs and their security teams. They were-and continue to be-in a constant race against time to improve security and performance.
|
By SafeBreach
Modern SOCs are complex environments with dozens of tools, overlapping teams, and a constantly growing attack surface to protect. To combat these challenges and keep up with the rapidly evolving threat landscape, security leaders must constantly strive to improve SOC efficiency and keep team members engaged.
- August 2026 (4)
- July 2026 (20)
- June 2026 (11)
- May 2026 (7)
- April 2026 (11)
- March 2026 (9)
- February 2026 (8)
- January 2026 (9)
- December 2025 (15)
- November 2025 (4)
- October 2025 (11)
- September 2025 (4)
- August 2025 (7)
- July 2025 (3)
- June 2025 (2)
- May 2025 (2)
- April 2025 (1)
- March 2025 (1)
- February 2025 (2)
- January 2025 (2)
- November 2024 (1)
- October 2024 (3)
- September 2024 (3)
- August 2024 (8)
- July 2024 (3)
- June 2024 (3)
- May 2024 (7)
- April 2024 (4)
- March 2024 (5)
- February 2024 (5)
- January 2024 (2)
- December 2023 (9)
- November 2023 (8)
- October 2023 (4)
- September 2023 (7)
- August 2023 (11)
- July 2023 (4)
- June 2023 (8)
- May 2023 (13)
- April 2023 (7)
- March 2023 (3)
- February 2023 (4)
- January 2023 (2)
- December 2022 (5)
Combining the mindset of a CISO and the toolset of a hacker, SafeBreach is the pioneer in breach-and-attack simulation (BAS) and is the most widely used platform for continuous security validation. SafeBreach continuously executes attacks, correlates results to help visualize security gaps, and leverages contextual insights to highlight remediation efforts.
With its Hacker’s Playbook™, the industry’s most extensive collection of attack data enabled by state-of-the-art threat intelligence research, SafeBreach empowers organizations to get proactive about security with a simple approach that replaces hope with data.
Unleash the power of your security controls to drive down risk.
- Attack with Purpose: Execute real-world attacks safely and continuously to identify what your security controls will prevent, detect, or miss.
- Analyze with Real-Time Data: Gain a quantitative view of your security posture by visualizing security-control performance data that’s not available anywhere else.
- Remediate with Intention: Review actionable data to quickly identify gaps, expedite remediation, and efficiently reduce risk.
- Report with Confidence: Communicate to key stakeholders with clear insights to quantify risk, prioritize investments, and ensure strategic alignment.
Gain visibility across the entire cyber kill chain.