Sunnyvale, CA, USA
2014
  |  By Stacey Nosan
The emergence of the CRINK axis—a coordinated cyber-threat nexus comprised of China, Russia, Iran, and North Korea—has dramatically impacted the 2026 global risk landscape. As these nation-states utilize AI-driven scale and living-off-the-land (LOTL) tactics to target critical infrastructure, SafeBreach’s new content series provides essential intelligence on their evolving motivations and methods.
  |  By SafeBreach
Dirty Frag (comprising CVE-2026-43284 and CVE-2026-43500) is a high-impact Linux kernel vulnerability chain that enables deterministic, reliable local privilege escalation (LPE) to root across major enterprise distributions. Unlike previous race-condition exploits, this logic flaw in the IPsec ESP and RxRPC subsystems offers a near 100% success rate, allowing attackers to escalate from a minor foothold to full system control without triggering typical kernel panics.
  |  By Uzi Galili
CVE-2026-31431— the “Copy Fail” vulnerability—is a critical local privilege escalation (LPE) flaw in the Linux kernel’s cryptographic subsystem that allows unprivileged users to gain root access with near-perfect reliability. Boasting a CVSS score of 7.8 and affecting nearly every mainstream distribution since 2017 (including Ubuntu, RHEL, and Amazon Linux), Copy Fail has been added to the CISA KEV catalog due to its active exploitation and portable, low-footprint nature.
  |  By SafeBreach
SafeBreach Helm is a pioneering AI agent designed to operationalize the complete Continuous Threat Exposure Management (CTEM) lifecycle by unifying SafeBreach’s industry-leading adversarial exposure validation (AEV) capabilities with data and insights from across an organization’s existing security ecosystem.
  |  By Yossi Attas
In the fifth installment of SafeBreach’s AI-First series, VP of Development Yossi Attas explores how the development team’s AI-First philosophy is being extended to the customer frontier and improved upon through the Anti-Hallucination Protocol.
  |  By Yossi Attas
In the fourth installment of SafeBreach’s AI-First evolution series, VP of Development Yossi Attas and Principal Software Design Engineer Guy Ephraim explore how test-driven development (TDD) serves as the essential “safety net” for high-speed AI code generation.
  |  By Yossi Attas
In the third installment of SafeBreach’s AI-First development series, VP of Development Yossi Attas explores the resurgence of the Product Requirements Document (PRD) as the foundational “control surface” for AI-assisted engineering.
  |  By Tova Dvorin
SafeBreach Senior Product Marketing Manager Tova Dvorin explores the critical necessity of continuous validation in Zero Trust architectures, specifically focusing on the integration of SafeBreach and Akamai Guardicore. While microsegmentation is a foundational element in the defense against lateral movement and ransomware propagation, dynamic infrastructure and policy drift often create “blind spots” that compromise security posture.
  |  By Yossi Attas
In this second installment of a series on the transformation of SafeBreach’s development organization, VP of Development Yossi Attas details a structured operational workflow that integrates Jira, BitBucket, and Claude Code to turn AI usage from ad-hoc prompting into a rigorous engineering methodology.
  |  By Uzi Galili
The new SafeBreach extension for VS Code integrates Breach Studio’s powerful custom attack development capabilities directly into the world’s most popular IDE to enable security teams to engineer custom attack simulations with unprecedented speed and precision. Security engineers can leverage Git-native version control, AI-assisted authoring, and real-time IntelliSense linting to eliminate friction and reduce failed executions.
  |  By SafeBreach
On June 22, 2026, the heads of all six Five Eyes cyber agencies — GCHQ, CISA, the NSA, ASD, the Canadian Centre, and New Zealand's GCSB — signed a rare joint statement: AI has rewritten the cyber risk timeline, and it's months, not years. Host Tova Dvorin and offensive security expert Adrian Culley unpack why AI is collapsing the window between vulnerability and exploit, why "having controls" isn't the same as proven controls, and why legacy systems are now strategic liabilities for the board, not the IT team. A clear-eyed look at validation, assumed breach, and what CISOs should do Monday morning.
  |  By SafeBreach
A criminal crew with APT-grade patience is trojanizing the very tools defenders trust. Host Tova Dvorin sits down with Adrian Culley to break down FBI FLASH-20260702-01 (coordinated with CISA) on TeamPCP — the group compromising Trivy, KICS, LiteLLM, and the Telnyx SDK to sit inside CI/CD pipelines. Inside: the CanisterWorm and SANDCLOCK credential stealers, the self-replicating "Mini Shai-Hulud" worm across npm and PyPI, npm account takeovers via expired recovery domains, and five concrete defenses — starting with searching your GitHub org for "tpcp-docs" right now.
  |  By SafeBreach
For years, Beijing and Moscow kept their cyber tools apart. Not anymore. Hosts Tova Dvorin and Adrian Culley unpack the "no limits" partnership gone operational — the ESA/Galileo satellite attack where a Chinese Volt Typhoon cell opened the door and Russian AcidRain wiper code did the damage. We cover: APT41 running Russian exploit kits, Salt Typhoon pre-positioned in US telecom, China's 72-hour zero-day disclosure law feeding vulnerabilities to Russia, and the CVSS-10 Grimbolt flaw. Why continuous validation and a CTEM program are your best defense against the axis of disruption.
  |  By SafeBreach
OWASP just shipped AIVSS — an entirely new vulnerability scoring methodology built for autonomous AI agents, where a compromised orchestrator can score a perfect 10. Host Tova Dvorin and Adrian break down the "amplification principle": why a 2.1 CVSS finding becomes a 7.1 in the wrong agent, how persistent memory and broad tool access expand every blast radius, and what EchoLeak-style attacks already mean for real deployments. Plus where adversarial exposure validation and SafeBreach's agentic AI coverage fit in.
  |  By SafeBreach
OWASP just shipped AIVSS — an entirely new vulnerability scoring methodology built for autonomous AI agents, where a compromised orchestrator can score a perfect 10. Host Tova Dvorin and Adrian break down the "amplification principle": why a 2.1 CVSS finding becomes a 7.1 in the wrong agent, how persistent memory and broad tool access expand every blast radius, and what EchoLeak-style attacks already mean for real deployments. Plus where adversarial exposure validation and SafeBreach's agentic AI coverage fit in.
  |  By SafeBreach
OWASP just shipped AIVSS—an entirely new vulnerability scoring methodology built for autonomous AI agents, where a compromised orchestrator can score a perfect 10. Host Tova Dvorin and Adrian break down the "amplification principle": why a 2.1 CVSS finding becomes a 7.1 in the wrong agent, how persistent memory and broad tool access expand every blast radius, and what EchoLeak-style attacks already mean for real deployments.
  |  By SafeBreach
Every CISO is asking it: now that frontier models like Claude Mythos and ChatGPT 5.5 have real offensive cyber capability, are zero days surging? Host Tova Dvorin and SafeBreach offensive engineer Adrian Culley dig into the mid-2026 data — GTIG, Mandiant M-Trends, Rapid7, AISI — and find the curve moved in shape, not volume. Inside: the two AI "firsts" (Big Sleep and a 2FA-bypass exploit), why commercial spyware explains the rebound, the negative-seven-day time-to-exploit, and why defender deployment is the real bottleneck.
  |  By SafeBreach
On June 22, 2026, the heads of all six Five Eyes cyber agencies — GCHQ, CISA, the NSA, ASD, the Canadian Centre, and New Zealand's GCSB — signed a rare joint statement: AI has rewritten the cyber risk timeline, and it's months, not years. Host Tova Dvorin and offensive security expert Adrian Culley unpack why AI is collapsing the window between vulnerability and exploit, why "having controls" isn't the same as proven controls, and why legacy systems are now strategic liabilities for the board, not the IT team. A clear-eyed look at validation, assumed breach, and what CISOs should do Monday morning.
  |  By SafeBreach
A criminal crew with APT-grade patience is trojanizing the very tools defenders trust. Host Tova Dvorin sits down with Adrian Culley to break down FBI FLASH-20260702-01 (coordinated with CISA) on TeamPCP — the group compromising Trivy, KICS, LiteLLM, and the Telnyx SDK to sit inside CI/CD pipelines. Inside: the CanisterWorm and SANDCLOCK credential stealers, the self-replicating "Mini Shai-Hulud" worm across npm and PyPI, npm account takeovers via expired recovery domains, and five concrete defenses — starting with searching your GitHub org for "tpcp-docs" right now.
  |  By SafeBreach
For years, Beijing and Moscow kept their cyber tools apart. Not anymore. Hosts Tova Dvorin and Adrian Culley unpack the "no limits" partnership gone operational — the ESA/Galileo satellite attack where a Chinese Volt Typhoon cell opened the door and Russian AcidRain wiper code did the damage. We cover: APT41 running Russian exploit kits, Salt Typhoon pre-positioned in US telecom, China's 72-hour zero-day disclosure law feeding vulnerabilities to Russia, and the CVSS-10 Grimbolt flaw. Why continuous validation and a CTEM program are your best defense against the axis of disruption.
  |  By SafeBreach
Today's CISOs and security teams must constantly validate security controls to identify gaps, remediate misconfigurations, and optimize performance against a rapidly increasing threat landscape. Breach and attack simulation (BAS) solutions-designed to continuously test the effectiveness of security controls and identify potential vulnerabilities-have emerged as a powerful tool to help organizations navigate this new reality. But not all BAS platforms are created equal.
  |  By SafeBreach
The mission of today's security teams is clear: protect the company from emerging cyber threats. What's less clear is how to ensure stakeholders understand the impact of their programs. Traditional security reporting focuses on threats and vulnerabilities and how many were stopped and prevented, but non-technical stakeholders-who are concerned with the business's bottom line and how these threats can impact business continuity-need to know how these activities translate to tangible business values. As risk is tied to revenue, security teams need a simple way to understand and share the real efficacy of their programs with their stakeholders.
  |  By SafeBreach
There are a number of security validation methods available on the market today, but each has different uses and functions. And, not all of them are appropriate in every IT environment. As a result, many organizations waste time and resources on technologies or approaches that may work well for others, but aren't a good fit for their specific use case.
  |  By SafeBreach
Starting a red-team program but not sure where to begin? Looking to improve your existing red-team operation? Before getting too far in the cyber weeds, go back to the basics with "The Fundamentals of Modern Cybersecurity Red Teaming."
  |  By SafeBreach
2022 saw a dramatic increase in the prevalence, severity, and impact of cyberattacks, presenting a striking new reality for CISOs and their security teams. They were-and continue to be-in a constant race against time to improve security and performance.
  |  By SafeBreach
Modern SOCs are complex environments with dozens of tools, overlapping teams, and a constantly growing attack surface to protect. To combat these challenges and keep up with the rapidly evolving threat landscape, security leaders must constantly strive to improve SOC efficiency and keep team members engaged.

Combining the mindset of a CISO and the toolset of a hacker, SafeBreach is the pioneer in breach-and-attack simulation (BAS) and is the most widely used platform for continuous security validation. SafeBreach continuously executes attacks, correlates results to help visualize security gaps, and leverages contextual insights to highlight remediation efforts.

With its Hacker’s Playbook™, the industry’s most extensive collection of attack data enabled by state-of-the-art threat intelligence research, SafeBreach empowers organizations to get proactive about security with a simple approach that replaces hope with data.

Unleash the power of your security controls to drive down risk.

  • Attack with Purpose: Execute real-world attacks safely and continuously to identify what your security controls will prevent, detect, or miss.
  • Analyze with Real-Time Data: Gain a quantitative view of your security posture by visualizing security-control performance data that’s not available anywhere else.
  • Remediate with Intention: Review actionable data to quickly identify gaps, expedite remediation, and efficiently reduce risk.
  • Report with Confidence: Communicate to key stakeholders with clear insights to quantify risk, prioritize investments, and ensure strategic alignment.

Gain visibility across the entire cyber kill chain.