In the ever-evolving landscape of cybersecurity, IT practitioners stand as the first line of defense against an increasingly sophisticated array of threats. Their role in safeguarding critical assets, data, and infrastructure has never been more crucial. But as the complexity and frequency of cyber attacks escalate, these professionals often find themselves overwhelmed by an ever-growing list of responsibilities and tasks.

File hosting services enable business email compromise (BEC) attacks, Mamba 2FA threatens global organizations, and the Dark Angels ransomware group conducts targeted attacks.

Virtual machines (VMs) running on cloud-native platforms like OpenShift Virtualization require robust backup and recovery solutions to avoid downtime and data loss. However, many organizations struggle with the complexities of backing up VMs in hybrid and multi-cloud environments, especially when managing infrastructure at scale.

CVE-2024-23113 is a critical (9.8) Fortinet FortiOS vulnerability allowing remote, unauthenticated attackers to execute arbitrary code or commands using specially crafted requests. The flaw uses an externally-controlled format string vulnerability in the FortiOS fgfmd daemon.

On September 26, 2024, four critical vulnerabilities, CVE-2024-47076, CVE-2024-47175, CVE-2024-47176, and CVE-2024-47177, were disclosed in the open-source printing system Common Unix Printing System (CUPS) and its components. Attackers can leverage the remote code execution (RCE) and input validation vulnerabilities as part of an attack chain.

On October 9th, 2024, five vulnerabilities were disclosed by Palo Alto Networks: These vulnerabilities affect Palo Alto Networks Expedition, a tool that manages configuration migration from supported vendors to Palo Alto Networks systems.

Third-party risk management (TPRM) is the structured process of identifying, assessing, and mitigating risks posed by external vendors, suppliers, and service providers. These risks can include cyber threats, data breaches, regulatory violations, and financial instability, all of which can severely impact your organization’s security and compliance posture.

We’ve all been there—staring at code, hoping no hidden traps are waiting to cause chaos down the line. That’s where secure code reviews come in. Think of them as your last chance to catch those pesky bugs and vulnerabilities before they wreak havoc. And here’s a little reality check—those cutting-edge LLMs? They suggest insecure code 30% of the time. So, even with AI on our side, we still need to stay sharp.