Industry researcher and analyst Jon Oltsik explains why vulnerability management should be considered a business issue and stop being viewed as a technical issue.
In this episode of Nucleus Conversations, industry analyst and researcher Jon Oltsik unpacks the current state of exposure management, why so many organizations still struggle to manage cyber risk at scale, and the impact the recent Nucleus 3.0 releases will have for customers.
Cybersecurity in 2026 will be driven by economics. Not hype. Not novelty. Economics. Attackers follow financial incentives and scale their operations faster than most enterprises can defend. CISOs must shift from reporting technical metrics to explaining business impact, guide safe AI adoption as Shadow AI grows, and design programs that emphasize resilience over perfection.
When Kenna launched more than a decade ago, it reshaped an industry that had grown numb to vulnerability overload. Back then, vulnerability management meant looking at mountains of CSV files, scanner reports, and a never-ending backlog of unprioritized issues. Kenna introduced the idea that risk instead of raw counts should determine what gets fixed first. For many security teams, it was the first time they realized they didn’t have a vulnerability problem.
Security leaders are bracing for a pivotal shift in 2026. Attacker economics are evolving, extortion models are changing shape, and organizations are rethinking how they allocate resources to defend against more scalable and financially motivated threats. In this on-demand webinar, four industry experts break down the forces reshaping cybersecurity strategy and offer practical guidance for leaders preparing for the next wave of challenges.
Many organizations set remediation SLAs, but static severity-based timelines and manual tracking prevent them from meeting those deadlines in a way that meaningfully reduces risk. This article outlines how automated, risk-based SLAs connect timelines to real exploitability, exposure, and asset value, turning deadlines into reliable, measurable outcomes. Key takeaways from this article.
For nearly a decade, we’ve been building Nucleus with a clear mission: to help security teams make faster, smarter, and more business-aligned decisions about what to fix first. When we started, the world called it vulnerability management. Today, the industry calls it exposure assessment. To us, that evolution isn’t just semantics, t’s the culmination of years spent redefining how organizations understand and reduce risk.
Nucleus Manager of Channel Enablement and Training, Tony Ramirez, talks about his recent recognition in CRN's 100 people to know for the channel. During this conversation, he also discusses the evolving role of channel leaders in cybersecurity, the importance of continuous threat exposure management (CTEM) as a process rather than a tool, and the need for contextual understanding in vulnerability management. Tony emphasizes the significance of engaging non-security stakeholders and the opportunities for the channel to educate clients on security posture and vulnerability management.
We’re proud to share that Nucleus Security has been named a Challenger in the inaugural 2025 Gartner Magic Quadrant for Exposure Assessment Platforms (EAPs) — recognized for our completeness of vision and ability to execute. This marks a significant milestone not only for Nucleus, but for the evolution of our entire industry. For the first time, Gartner has formally recognized Exposure Assessment Platforms as a distinct category.
Building an exposure management program is just the beginning of a long journey. True success comes from scaling that program through continuous optimization, measurable progress, and organizational alignment. As enterprises expand their digital footprint, exposure management must evolve from reactive vulnerability remediation to a proactive, data-driven discipline that continuously strengthens resilience.