Security | Threat Detection | Cyberattacks | DevSecOps | Compliance

Today, we’re excited to announce a preview of the Model Context Protocol (MCP) Server for Nucleus. This marks an important step towards AI-native workflows for vulnerability and exposure management. Model Context Protocol (MCP) is an emerging industry standard enabling seamless integration between enterprise applications and AI models. Backed by leading organizations like OpenAI, Microsoft, and Google, MCP servers are quickly becoming the foundation for AI-enablement across the enterprise.

In today’s digital landscape, where cyber threats grow more sophisticated and frequent, organizations must prioritize robust strategies to protect their critical assets—data, systems, and networks. Asset risk mitigation is a cornerstone of cybersecurity, involving the identification, assessment, and management of risks to these valuable resources. Two primary approaches dominate this field: proactive and reactive risk mitigation.

Organizations operating in sprawling, hybrid IT environments often lack complete visibility into all assets and their communication patterns. This gap creates blind spots where vulnerabilities go undetected, third-party components remain unpatched, and unauthorized lateral movement can occur without raising alarms.

Artificial intelligence—it’s a term you’ve likely encountered more than once today, and this won’t be the last. And while it reshapes how businesses operate, it’s also introducing new risks. As organizations embrace AI-powered tools for efficiency and innovation, it becomes essential to understand what technologies your vendors rely on, and what those choices mean for your cybersecurity posture.

Today, we're taking a big step toward making trust management even easier for our customers: Vanta has acquired Riskey, a company leading the way in real-time third-party risk monitoring. Their continuous vendor monitoring and alerting will soon be part of Vanta’s Vendor Risk Management product. ‍ Managing vendor risk is more important than ever.

In our first article exploring vulnerability management vs. exposure management, we explored the growing recognition that exposure management is not just a rebranding of vulnerability management. Rather, it’s a strategic evolution. Where traditional vulnerability management often focuses narrowly on CVEs and technical severity, exposure management demands a broader, more integrated understanding of risk across assets, environments, and attack vectors.