Security | Threat Detection | Cyberattacks | DevSecOps | Compliance

It’s no secret that human error still plays a significant role in data breaches - despite ongoing security and awareness training. But how do we finally disrupt this trend? The answer lies in a new approach to human risk management.

If you’re a security analyst, you know the work never stops. Even after your team completes an extensive vendor risk assessment and remediation, you still need to write a report to share your findings with key stakeholders. And this work isn’t a walk in the park by any means. Writing a risk assessment report often requires hours (or even days) of summarizing information, repopulating graphs, and balancing technical details with clarity to cater to technical and non-technical stakeholders.

Organizations today move fast, but slow vendor approvals can grind everything to a halt. As companies increasingly rely on third-party vendors, slow vendor approvals create a serious security bottleneck. This slowdown costs organizations valuable time and resources—and leaves them open to security risks. It’s important to cohesively review and approve vendors to manage third-party risk, but organizations should be aware of just how long those approvals take.

Researchers have discovered a critical security vulnerability in Next.js that allows attackers to easily bypass middleware authorization measures. The vulnerability, designated CVE-2025-29927, was discovered by Rachid Allam and Yasser Allam and since assigned a base CVSS score of 9.1. By skipping checks for authorization cookies, attackers can potentially gain access to restricted areas of applications like admin tools and dashboards.

Managing the vendor remediation process is no small feat. While on the surface, it might seem like the bulk of the heavy lifting is done once you complete your initial assessment, you (and every other security team on the planet) know this couldn’t be further from the truth. After all, if your team doesn’t constantly track remediation efforts and validate corrective actions, how else are you supposed to ensure vendors effectively mitigate the risks you identified?

Staying on top of corporate security trends may seem like a hassle, but it actually has great benefits for your organization. Understanding security trends helps businesses benchmark their performance—including within their specific industry—and strengthen their security posture to align with the best performers.

When it comes to closing a sales deal, trust and security are often just as important as the product or service you’re selling — sometimes even more important. The reason is simple. Before bringing you on as a new vendor, customers need to be confident that you’re a safe and secure partner. The challenge is proving your security posture quickly, without dramatically slowing the deal.

Cybersecurity is a high-stakes landscape, with very real threats of data breaches, malware, and other cyberattacks lurking around the corner. But detecting cyber threats is only half the battle—what happens when the threats you detect aren’t real? Enter the deceiving world of false positives—security alerts that incorrectly identify legitimate activity as malicious. While most security tools are designed to maximize detection, they often sacrifice accuracy in the process. The result?

Ollama is an emerging open-source framework designed to run large language models (LLMs) locally. While it provides a flexible and efficient way to serve AI models, improper configurations can introduce serious security risks. Many organizations unknowingly expose Ollama instances to the internet, leaving them vulnerable to unauthorized access, data exfiltration, and adversarial manipulation.

Navigating the maze that is vendor-supplied evidence is one of the most time-consuming and frustrating tasks security teams face during the risk assessment process. Imagine spending countless hours chasing down security information from a vendor only to receive a mountain of dense, unstructured (sometimes contradictory) documents. How can you possibly move forward? Security analysts have long dealt with this very problem.