Security | Threat Detection | Cyberattacks | DevSecOps | Compliance

Each year, cyber attacks and data breaches are becoming more devastating for organizations. According to the 2022 Cost of a Data Breach Report by IBM, the global average cost of a data breach reached a record US$4.35 million in 2022. However, security teams are often not ready to detect all security gaps in their organizations. The scope of their monitoring is usually so broad that it’s challenging to anticipate where a potential threat might come from.

Multiple reports show that people don’t take the necessity to pick secure passwords for their login credentials and personal devices seriously enough. According to Verizon’s 2022 Data Breach Investigations Report, 80% of incidents resulting from hacking attacks involved weak and compromised passwords. These findings make us wonder whether confirming a user’s identity just once at login is enough. Should this be a repeated procedure?

Personal data remains attractive for malicious actors and cybercriminals. As they evolve their methods for stealing and compromising such data, implementing sufficient data protection measures is especially vital for any organization. In some industries, protecting personal data is a must to comply with privacy laws and regulations. But even if your organization is not subject to a particular data privacy requirement, it’s highly recommended to secure the data of your customers and employees.

Intellectual property (IP) is crucial for manufacturing organizations to compete in the market. At the same time, IP may be a target for dishonest competitors, former employees, and cybercriminals. That's why it's vital to take all possible measures to protect the security of intellectual property in the manufacturing sector.

The increasing digitalization and interconnectivity of the manufacturing industry has fundamentally changed how this sector operates. With automation, remote diagnostics, and connections to the internet, manufacturers have faced a growing number of cybersecurity challenges, including insider risks.

The world is changing rapidly, with organizations facing new cybersecurity challenges all the time, forcing them to continuously update their cybersecurity strategies. This is especially relevant when it comes to events that have a global effect, like the COVID-19 pandemic and Russia's invasion of Ukraine.

Establishing proper privileged account management procedures is an essential part of insider risk protection. There are some common mistakes companies make when managing accounts of privileged users. In this article, we overview eight widespread poor account management practices, analyze their consequences, and discuss ways to improve them. We also take a look at Ekran System’s account management capabilities that you can benefit from.

Traditional identity and access management (IAM) implementation methods can’t provide enough flexibility, responsiveness, and efficiency. Indeed, many organizations struggle with developing a mature IAM program according to the State of Enterprise Identity report by the Ponemon Institute. Among the key reasons for this challenge cited by respondents in the report are a lack of employee awareness, an insufficient budget, and ineffective planning.

Ekran System is glad to announce new capabilities for integrating with Microsoft Power BI that will help you simplify data processing and visualization. Since the majority of our customers use Microsoft Power BI to visualize data, optimizing the Ekran System API for working with this tool was a top priority for us. Now, you can easily and quickly export your monitoring data from Ekran System directly to a report template of your choice in Power BI.

Managing access rights of privileged users is one of the cornerstones of data security. That’s why the privileged access management (PAM) market is booming with tools and practices. But this variety of PAM options makes it challenging to figure out which practices and controls your organization can benefit from.