Security | Threat Detection | Cyberattacks | DevSecOps | Compliance

If you thought PCI DSS 4.0.1 was just a minor tweak to the old requirements, think again. 2025 is here, and it’s clear that many SAQ A-EP merchants are still missing critical steps needed to stay compliant. In fact, we noticed that over 90% of SAQ A-EP merchants aren’t aware that they need to implement new technical measures to address Requirements 6.4.3 and 11.6.1.

PCI DSS 4 Compliance requires a clear understanding of the latest requirements, particularly Requirement 6.4.3 and 11.6.1, which emphasize the importance of JavaScript monitoring for maintaining secure payment environments. For AppSec, Infosec, or ISA/QSA professionals, staying on top of PCI DSS 4.0.1 can feel overwhelming, but protecting payment card data leaves no room for errors.

Web Pixel Privacy Risks and Mitigation Strategies are crucial topics for businesses today. In the previous posts, we explored the world of web pixels, uncovering potential privacy risks and highlighting the importance of a thorough audit. Now, let’s shift our focus to actionable strategies for mitigating these risks and ensuring your web pixel usage is both effective and ethical.

Web Pixel Audit is essential to address privacy risks and enhance data security. In this post, we’ll explore how to evaluate your organization’s use of these digital trackers and identify potential vulnerabilities.

Hey everyone, let’s talk about something we all encounter every day on the internet: web pixels. You might know them as tracking pixels or pixel tags. These tiny snippets of code, often invisible to the naked eye, are embedded in websites and emails. They might seem harmless, but they can have big consequences for your company’s privacy and security.

If you are a security, compliance, and privacy professional, it’s time to focus on an often-ignored issue—client-side security. While many organizations dedicate significant resources to protecting their servers, there’s a critical question to consider: are you also safeguarding what’s happening on your users’ browsers?

Recent lawsuits have revealed a critical privacy concern for healthcare providers – the sharing of patient data with Facebook through tracking pixels. We wrote this article to help your security and privacy teams assess their risk, identify key stakeholders, and understand the urgency of this issue.

Picture this scenario: You’ve used every tool you have to secure your web pages and forms so patient information is safe. One day, a potential patient Googles “hysterectomy options” and ends up on your hospital’s website. They browse around, maybe even schedule an appointment online. You have no reason to worry, right? Because you’ve done what you could to secure those pages.

Websites have become indispensable tools for healthcare organizations to connect with patients, streamline operations, and enhance service delivery. Modern websites are composed of components that “build” unique user experiences in real time.However, the use of tracking technologies on these websites presents unique challenges in complying with the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA).

When we think about HIPAA compliance and websites, the focus often shifts to patient portals, online scheduling systems, and other secure areas requiring user authentication. However, it’s crucial to recognize that even unauthenticated webpages, those accessible to the public without logging in, can present hidden HIPAA risks. Let’s explore these often-overlooked vulnerabilities and discuss how covered entities can mitigate potential compliance pitfalls.