Security | Threat Detection | Cyberattacks | DevSecOps | Compliance

Co-founder and COO I have been using AI coding tools since the beginning. Back around 2022, I built a RAG system that would return links to relevant documentation when users made a search request. Initially, I wanted the AI to answer the user's question directly, but at the time it would hallucinate so much that I didn't trust the output enough to put it in front of users. Instead, I had the AI return static links to the relevant documentation.

Accelerating security solutions for small businesses‍ Tagore offers strategic services to small businesses. A partnership that can scale‍ Tagore prioritized finding a managed compliance partner with an established product, dedicated support team, and rapid release rate. Standing out from competitors‍ Tagore's partnership with Vanta enhances its strategic focus and deepens client value, creating differentiation in a competitive market.

Recent campaigns show a consistent pattern: a supply chain attack compromises trusted software to reach the credentials held by developer machines and CI/CD pipelines.

Ask ten people what "AI regulation" means, and you'll get ten different answers, and most of them will assume the others are talking about the same thing. They're not. "Regulate AI" has become a catch-all phrase covering several genuinely distinct regulatory questions, each with its own goal, its own toolkit, and its own plausible answer, bundled together so tightly that arguing about one gets mistaken for arguing about all of them.

Enterprises aren't standardizing on one AI agent platform. Security teams are watching Copilot run alongside ChatGPT Enterprise, homegrown agents built on internal frameworks, and endpoint coding agents like Claude and Codex, often all inside the same organization. Each platform brings its own credentials, tool access, and blind spots, and none of them wait for a security review before taking an action.

To address Claude Mythos cybersecurity risks, security teams need to adapt for a world where AI can accelerate the path from vulnerability discovery to exploitation. That means moving toward continuous exposure management, shortening the time from discovery to verified remediation, prioritizing based on real exploitability rather than severity alone, reassessing older software as new risks emerge, and making AI usage part of the organization’s broader exposure picture.

Cisco has disclosed a critical authentication bypass affecting Cisco Identity Services Engine (ISE) and Cisco ISE Passive Identity Connector (ISE-PIC). Tracked as CVE-2026-76460, the vulnerability allows an unauthenticated, remote attacker to send a crafted request to an affected API endpoint and bypass the web-based management interface. The vulnerability received the highest possible CVSS v3.1 score of 10.0.

When Anthropic introduced Mythos Preview, the story practically wrote itself. Here was a frontier AI model taking work that once required researchers and threat actors a lot of time and compressing it into hours. Mythos demonstrated the ability to find and exploit vulnerabilities across major operating systems and browsers. In controlled testing, it produced a working Firefox code-execution exploit in less than an hour and developed eight in roughly 12 hours.

AI adoption is outpacing enterprise control. The 2026 Verizon DBIR found that 45% of employees regularly use AI on corporate devices, and 67% of those users access AI through non-corporate accounts. Cyberhaven Labs reports that 39.7% of data sent to AI tools is sensitive, while endpoint AI app adoption grew 509% year over year.

Large language models are now a core part of the software development lifecycle. The 2025 Stack Overflow Developer Survey found that 82% of developers used OpenAI’s GPT models in their work last year, and Google has reported that AI now writes over 25% of new code committed at the company. All of that rests on one assumption. The model understands what you asked, and its answer is accurate.