|
By Cyberhaven
Most data management frameworks list security as one component among several, including governance, quality, integration, retention, architecture, and analytics. Security is often treated as an equally weighted checkbox on the same list as the others. That framing is where data security programs start to break down.
|
By Cyberhaven
Security and governance teams often use "data lineage" and "data provenance" as if they have the same definition and offer the same insights. They don't, and the gap between them shows up fast once a program tries to act on it. A provenance record can tell you where a file came from, but it cannot tell you what happened to it after an employee copied it into a new spreadsheet, renamed it, and uploaded it to a personal cloud drive.
|
By Cyberhaven
An AI agent on a developer's laptop has read access to a code repository, a set of internal documents, and an external model. Nobody approved that specific combination, and nobody is watching what the agent does with it session to session. The agent is not malicious, however, it is doing exactly what it was configured to do. But, that configuration is the exposure, and most security teams do not have a way to see it, let alone stop it before sensitive data leaves the environment.
|
By Cyberhaven
AI has swiftly shifted from a browser-based chat interface to an autonomous actor operating within enterprise environments. Agents run locally on endpoints, inherit employee permissions, access sensitive data in bulk, and execute multi-step workflows with no human approving each step. That shift fundamentally changes the enforcement surface. The governance programs most organizations have built were designed for a different model: one user, one prompt, one decision.
|
By Cyberhaven
Mergers and acquisitions (M&A) concentrate risk into a narrow window. The moment a deal is announced, employees with access to proprietary research, source code, and unreleased product plans face pressure and opportunity at the same time. Some update their resumes. A smaller number decide to take something with them: a research file, a pricing model, or a customer list before the transition is final. For compliance and security teams, the challenge goes beyond stopping data exfiltration.
|
By Cyberhaven
Security teams that roll out Microsoft Purview DLP inside their Microsoft ecosystem often assume coverage extends further than it does. Policies apply cleanly to Word, Excel, and Outlook. Then a sensitive.dwg is inspected only by extension because Purview doesn't scan CAD content, a developer on a Linux workstation falls outside endpoint coverage entirely, or raw source code moves to a USB drive without matching the source-code classifier, which runs on the endpoint only for Office and PDF files.
|
By Aman Sirohi
Building guardrails for AI agents sounds like a policy problem but it is actually a data problem. You cannot enforce boundaries on behavior you cannot see. And you cannot govern identity for actors you have not discovered. That dependency chain is what most enterprise security programs miss in 2026, and it is where exposure quietly accumulates. A human employee who mishandles sensitive data creates a containable event. An AI agent with the same permissions creates a different problem.
|
By Cyberhaven
An analyst pulls up the DLP console expecting to see alerts on the source code, customer records, and financial data employees paste into ChatGPT, Copilot, and a dozen other AI tools every day. Instead, the console is quiet, because the policies enacted by the legacy DLP system were built to catch file transfers and email attachments. But, none of the above traffic looks like a file transfer.
|
By Cyberhaven
Enterprise AI adoption has outpaced enterprise AI governance. Seventy-eight percent of organizations now use AI in at least one business function, up from 55% the year before, and most of that adoption happened before governance teams finished drafting their first policy. The result is a familiar pattern: leadership approves a rollout, security builds guardrails around the tools it knows about, and sensitive data keeps moving through channels nobody mapped.
|
By Cyberhaven
AI agents now retrieve data, generate recommendations, and trigger actions across enterprise systems with little human review in between. That speed is the point, and it is also the problem. A single manipulated prompt or a poisoned data source can push an AI system toward a decision no one signed off on, and most security teams have never tested for it. Building a red team exercise for AI workflows is how you find that gap before an attacker does.
|
By Cyberhaven
In this video, you will learn the five questions every data leak investigation must answer to be defensible — what the data is, where it originated, who accessed it, where it spread, and the fastest containment step — and why the visibility gap in most security stacks makes those questions impossible to answer instantly. You will also learn how combining DSPM baseline inventory with real-time data lineage replaces the high-stress scramble with surgical containment and audit-ready proof, so you move from "I think we're safe" to "here is the proof.".
|
By Cyberhaven
In this video, you will learn why locking down source systems like your CRM, HR database, and S3 buckets leaves your real risk surface exposed, how one regulated file fragments into CSV exports, screenshots, scripts, and AI prompts that shed their security context at every hop, and why both legacy DLP and traditional DSPM fail to act on these invisible derivatives. You will also learn how lineage-focused DSPM tracks the provenance of the data payload itself — every copy, paste, and save — so you can enforce policy on fragments instead of guessing from patterns.
|
By Cyberhaven
Autonomous AI agents are running on enterprise endpoints right now, accessing files, processing sensitive data, and executing actions outside the visibility of most security programs. This is Part 1 of Cyberhaven's four-part AI Security product launch series. What this video covers: Most AI security tools were built for browsers and SaaS apps. They cannot see agents operating at the OS level, coding assistants running in IDEs and CLIs, or MCP servers executing in the background. Cyberhaven's AI Security platform was built to close that gap.
|
By Cyberhaven
Security teams cannot govern what they cannot see. This is Part 2 of Cyberhaven's four-part AI Security product launch series, focused on Shadow AI Discovery and how Cyberhaven automatically inventories every AI app and agent running across your organization.
|
By Cyberhaven
Visibility without enforcement is just an alert backlog. This is Part 4 of Cyberhaven's four-part AI Security product launch series, covering how Cyberhaven enforces risk-based controls at the data level, not the tool level, using Data Lineage as the foundation.
|
By Cyberhaven
Knowing an AI tool exists is not the same as knowing what it did with your data. This is Part 3 of Cyberhaven's 4-part AI Security product launch series, covering Agentic AI Visibility and AI Risk IQ, Cyberhaven's evidence-based risk scoring system for every AI app and agent in your environment.
|
By Cyberhaven
In this video, you will learn why agentic browsers like ChatGPT Atlas, Perplexity Comet, and Arc have turned the browser into a double agent inside your enterprise, how shadow adoption is bypassing MDM and endpoint controls in days, and why indirect prompt injection creates an attack surface your file-based DLP cannot see. You will also learn how data lineage replaces noisy content inspection with origin-and-destination tracking, so you can stop the leak without blocking the tools your business depends on.
|
By Cyberhaven
In this video, you will learn why static domain-blocking strategies fail against the modern Shadow AI ecosystem, how Generative AI wrappers, browser extensions, and personal accounts bypass corporate firewalls without triggering an alert, and why network-layer inspection cannot distinguish proprietary code from public Stack Overflow snippets. We break down the limitations of traditional DLP at the clipboard layer, explain how data lineage replaces application allow-lists, and show how the "Glass House" model lets enterprises enable AI productivity while strictly gating sensitive data movement.
|
By Cyberhaven
In this video, you will learn how lightweight OS-level instrumentation binds lineage metadata to clipboard content the moment data is copied, how that tag survives edits, reformatting, and translation across applications, and how provenance-based policy replaces pattern matching with precision rules tied to the actual source of the data. You will also learn how pairing network tools with a browser extension captures user intent before encryption, eliminating the alert fatigue that buries real risk in noise.
|
By Cyberhaven
In this video, you will learn why agentic browsers like ChatGPT Atlas, Perplexity Comet, and Arc have turned the browser into a double agent inside your enterprise, how shadow adoption is bypassing MDM and endpoint controls in days, and why indirect prompt injection creates an attack surface your file-based DLP cannot see. You will also learn how data lineage replaces noisy content inspection with origin-and-destination tracking, so you can stop the leak without blocking the tools your business depends on.
|
By Cyberhaven
Dive into our expertly curated DLP program checklist that will align with your organization's ambitious business and catapult them forward.
|
By Cyberhaven
In this guide we demystify DLP to distill the basics of DLP program development. Learn the essentials required to create scalable data security and data protection programs.
|
By Cyberhaven
Data is leaving your company in ways that didn't exist years ago-AirDrop, generative AI, and more. Legacy DLP hasn't kept up; now it's time to invest in more forward-looking solutions.
|
By Cyberhaven
DDR makes it possible to stop data exfiltration across all channels with one product and one set of policies.
- July 2026 (12)
- June 2026 (24)
- May 2026 (29)
- April 2026 (14)
- March 2026 (11)
- February 2026 (9)
- January 2026 (11)
- December 2025 (10)
- November 2025 (6)
- October 2025 (3)
- September 2025 (6)
- August 2025 (7)
- July 2025 (10)
- June 2025 (1)
- April 2025 (8)
- March 2025 (6)
- February 2025 (2)
- January 2025 (2)
- November 2024 (1)
- October 2024 (1)
- September 2024 (5)
- August 2024 (3)
- July 2024 (3)
- June 2024 (2)
- May 2024 (1)
- April 2024 (1)
- March 2024 (2)
- February 2024 (2)
- January 2024 (2)
- November 2023 (1)
- April 2023 (1)
Cyberhaven detects and stops the most critical insider risks to your most important data.
Let’s face it, data security products never lived up to our expectations and now that the way we work is changing they can’t keep up. Cyberhaven solves these challenges so companies can finally protect their data.
Data Detection and Response:
- Understand how data flows: See what systems store different types of data and how data moves within the company to new places and people.
- Stop data exfiltration anywhere: Block important data from leaving your control via cloud, web, email, removable storage, Bluetooth/AirDrop, and more.
- Accelerate internal investigations: Quickly understand an incident to determine user intent with a complete record of events before and during an incident.
- Detect and stop risky behavior: Instantly detect when a user handles important data in a risky way, stop them in real time, and coach them.
Trace your data to protect it like never before.