Security | Threat Detection | Cyberattacks | DevSecOps | Compliance

You shipped an app in a weekend. The AI wrote the login, the dashboard, and the database layer, and everything works, but it’s far from safe. With 0 logins, an attacker can forge admin invitations, alter audit logs, and change other users’ passwords. The guy is just swimming freestyle through your entire app stack. This is just one of the 137 vulnerabilities we found in vibe-coding across the top 4 platforms.

We handed four vibe-coding tools (Emergent, Replit, Lovable, Base44) the same prompt for a FastAPI user-management microservice. The spec was explicit: JWT auth, parameterized queries, rate limiting, four-tier role model with per-endpoint scope. Each tool shipped a build, and our flagship autonomous pentest surfaced 137 confirmed vulnerabilities across all four.

Vibe-coding platforms let you go from prompt to a deployed app in a single session, a pace that outpaces the review cycles most teams built for slower releases. With Lovable nearing 8 million users by late 2025, and Replit past 50 million by April 2026, we wanted to answer a sharper question than “is vibe coding safe?” Does the platform generating the code change the outcome, and does one security prompt give you the same security everywhere?

Binance never chose to be on the front line of a geopolitical conflict, yet if blockchain-intelligence firms are right, that is where it ended up, and its balance sheet absorbed the first loss. Binance’s initial investigation indicates that a compromised DevOps engineer’s laptop may have given an attacker access to a service container and the ability to submit unauthorised withdrawals.