|
By Gary Hayslip
I’ve been on enough middle-of-the-night incident calls to know what separates the organizations that recover quickly from the ones that don’t. It’s rarely the size of the security budget. It’s whether leadership asks the right questions in the first hour, and then lets the team work.
|
By Ben Hanson
Agentic AI security is a new budget line for most organizations, which means security buyers across EMEA often face the dual challenge of evaluating solutions and justifying the spend at the same time. For organizations operating within the EU AI Act, GDPR, NIS2, and DORA, the business case has a dimension that doesn't exist in less regulated markets: the cost of non-compliance is not a vague, abstract risk.
|
By Amir Abramovitch
Cohere's researchers caught Qwen3.8-Flash-Next, Alibaba's August preview of its Qwen4 architecture, attempting an unrequested upload during a routine security task. They were running it through CTI-REALM, Microsoft's benchmark for agents doing a security analyst's job. The task: write a rule that detects curl downloading a bash script to /tmp and executing it.
|
By Brandon Borodach
Every security team I talk to has some version of the same document. It might be called an “AI Acceptable Use Policy” or “Agent Governance Standards.” It usually lives in Confluence or SharePoint. It says sensible things: coding agents shouldn’t touch production credentials, assistants shouldn’t email sensitive data outside the company, and nobody should connect an unvetted MCP server to an agent with access to customer records.
|
By Yonatan Michaeli
An AI innovation team is asked to build a customer support assistant in two weeks. The demo works, employees start using it, and leadership wants to put it in front of customers. Somewhere between the prototype and the rollout, the team has created a new data table, an API endpoint, and a scheduled job. The project has a sponsor. Does every piece across the customer support assistant have an owner?
|
By Rock Lambros
Security investment decisions are always, at some level, conversations about risk quantification: how much exposure does the organization actually carry, what does it cost to reduce that exposure, and what's the cost of not acting at all. For agentic AI security, these questions are answerable once the right measurement is in place.
|
By Jenny Abramov
As AI agents operate with increasing autonomy in enterprise production, the sheer volume of security telemetry they generate creates an unprecedented scaling challenge. Human oversight remains required in many enterprises, while legacy triage tools simply can't keep up. To help security teams cut through the noise, Zenity’s AI group built the Blue Agent.
|
By Snir Hassidim
Anthropic's Inference Hooks update lets security teams validate Claude's tool calls before they run. Zenity supports it across Claude's surfaces, so teams can approve write-capable connectors, Model Context Protocol (MCP) servers, and wider Claude Code rollouts with policy on each action.
|
By Rock Lambros
The agentic AI security conversation has, for good reason, spent most of its energy on the agents an organization builds or deploys directly: what they're authorized to do, what data they can reach, how their behavior is monitored. I think that focus is necessary and also increasingly incomplete, because the fastest-growing risk surface in agentic AI right now isn't the agents themselves.
|
By Ian Miller
Japan’s Ministry of Finance reports that AI adoption in large local enterprises has surged to 89%. Companies are progressively choosing to incorporate AI agents into their workflows, building with Microsoft Copilot Studio, ChatGPT Enterprise, Claude, and a myriad of other platforms, all living across a variety of environments with autonomy, privilege, and minimal supervision.
|
By Zenity
Zenity's low-code security research team is exposed to real world low-code applications on a daily basis, and we're glad to share our knowledge in this domain in order to help you to design and develop secure low-code applications.
- October 2026 (13)
- September 2026 (10)
- August 2026 (10)
- July 2026 (9)
- June 2026 (14)
- May 2026 (6)
- April 2026 (11)
- March 2026 (9)
- February 2026 (3)
- January 2026 (6)
- December 2025 (7)
- November 2025 (6)
- October 2025 (8)
- September 2025 (7)
- August 2025 (1)
- July 2025 (2)
- June 2025 (7)
- May 2025 (5)
- April 2025 (6)
- March 2025 (1)
- February 2025 (3)
- January 2025 (4)
- December 2024 (5)
- November 2024 (2)
- October 2024 (2)
- September 2024 (4)
- July 2024 (3)
- June 2024 (2)
- May 2024 (6)
- April 2024 (2)
- March 2024 (2)
- February 2024 (2)
- January 2024 (3)
- December 2023 (2)
- November 2023 (4)
- October 2023 (1)
- September 2023 (5)
- July 2023 (2)
- June 2023 (3)
- May 2023 (7)
- April 2023 (4)
- March 2023 (3)
- February 2023 (3)
- January 2023 (1)
- December 2022 (1)
- November 2022 (2)
- September 2022 (2)
- August 2022 (1)
- July 2022 (2)
- June 2022 (1)
- May 2022 (3)
- April 2022 (2)
- February 2022 (1)
- January 2022 (3)
- December 2021 (2)
- November 2021 (3)
- October 2021 (3)
Continuously protecting all low-code/no-code applications and components! Design and implement governance policies, identify security risks, detect emerging threats and drive automatic mitigation and response.
Low-code/no-code development and automation platforms are the wave of the future. The largest companies in the world are already adopting low-code/no-code development for their core business units. But with all their benefits, low-code/no-code development brings with it a host of governance challenges and risks that are unaddressed by existing InfoSec and AppSec solutions.
Zenity, the first and only governance and security platform for low-code/no-code applications, creates a win-win environment where IT and information security can give business and pro developers the freedom and independence they want in order to continue pushing their business forward while retaining full visibility and control.
Our Platform:
- Discover: Identify shadow-IT business applications across your low-code/no-code fleet and track sensitive and business data movement.
- Mitigate: Identify insecure, vulnerable and risky configurations. Drive mitigation and remediation immediately.
- Govern: Design policies and implement automatic enforcement. Eliminate risks without disrupting business.
- Protect: Detect suspicious and malicious activity, such as supply-chain attacks, malware obfuscation and data leakage.
Governance and Security for Low-Code/No-Code Applications.