In the race for technological innovation, companies often sprint toward product launches but find themselves in a marathon when fixing vulnerabilities. This dichotomy poses a significant challenge, especially with the ever-increasing security loopholes. CISA recommends addressing critical issues in less than 15 days, but it may be wishful thinking. IT teams are inundated with an ever-increasing volume of security alerts, making it challenging to prioritize and address each one effectively.

Researchers discover modified Notepad++ plug-in, new junk gun ransomware appears on cybercrime forums, and a malvertising campaign targets IT teams.

The huge ecosystem of integrations has over time become a true differentiator for Open Policy Agent (OPA), and an embodiment of the project’s promise to provide policy across the “whole cloud native stack”. Integrating OPA into a new tech stack also tends to be a rewarding experience for developers, which might help explain why so many integrations have been provided by external contributors over the years.

While unit testing is crucial for improving code quality and reducing later testing time, it consumes at least 15% of developers' time. Developers can utilize automated fuzz tests to allocate more time for developing new features. They replace negative test cases, constituting around 30% of unit tests. In a recent analysis of a Java project using a fuzzing platform, a single fuzz test was equivalent to potentially 309 unit tests, achieving 74% code coverage within just 25 seconds.

The fight against money laundering and terrorist financing requires a united front, with financial institutions and large corporations playing a critical role. One key weapon in this arsenal? Politically Exposed Persons (PEP) screening. PEP screening identifies individuals with prominent public positions or close ties to them, who may be exposed to a higher risk of bribery, corruption, and other financial crimes due to their influence.

Tech leaders taking cybersecurity seriously is something of a double-edged sword. While it’s undoubtedly good that organizations are waking up to the genuine threat cyberattacks pose, it’s depressing that they must siphon off so many resources to protect themselves rather than using them for growth and innovation.

Alexandre Dumas's timeless novel "The Three Musketeers" immortalized the ideal of unyielding solidarity, the enduring motto "All for one and one for all." In the face of ever-evolving threats in the digital realm, the European Union echoes this spirit with its landmark Cyber Solidarity Act.

One of the biggest benefits that an exposure management program can afford a security program is the power of risk-informed prioritization. When security leaders think of tooling like attack surface management (ASM) platforms, the most evident prioritization benefits come in the day-to-day tactical decisions of which threats and which exposures to have SecOps practitioners tackle first.

From financial losses to legal issues to a damaged reputation, the consequences of a data breach can severely impair organizations. Therefore, having robust data breach incident response and investigation procedures is critical for organizations to mitigate the impact of such incidents. In this article, we review what a data breach is and how it can influence your organization as well as provide eight simple steps to efficiently respond to and investigate data breaches.